2022-23 Winter Link Review
Trying something short and new. Here are summaries and notes for two salient topics.
Mark Mills: The energy transition delusion: inescapable mineral realities
Summary
The mining sector cannot support the mineral demand to transition even the US from 4% renewables to 10% within 16 years, let alone to 100% by 2050.
Decreasing mineral quality, slow mine construction, high mineral demand, and other factors are conspiring to make the energy transition far slower and more expensive than publicly aware.
Notes
World at 3% wind/solar production
$5 trillion USD in direct spending over 15 years
This does not include hidden costs due to mandates, inefficiencies, etc.
Will the cost per point decrease throughout the transition?
The quantity of minerals per unit of power needed to transition is enormous
To produce an equivalent amount of energy with only the below
EV: >400% total increase
Copper >300%
Solar PV: >900% total
Copper >200%
Onshore wind: >800% total
Copper >150%
Offshore wind: >1800% total
Copper >1100%
Mineral demand will increase by 2040
Max: Lithium demand expected to increase by 4000%
Min: Rare earths 700%
Some minerals possess substitutes, but copper does not
Copper prices will continue to increase throughout 2020s as demand increases and supply shrinks
New mines require approx. 16 years from prospect to first output
Mineral refinery market has extreme geopolitical implications
China dominates market with
Nickel: 35%
Lithium/Cobalt: 50-70%
Rare earths: 90%
Could have more influence over the future energy sector than OPEC
Comparing EV & fossil fuel cars
Mineral cost of EVs is 2x
CO2 per car
EV with 1000 lb battery
50% the size of a Tesla battery
Diesel vehicle
Higher emissions than gasoline vehicle
1000 lb battery EV total emissions falls below diesel after 60,000 miles of driving
Cost of mining is increasing
Energy consumption to extract ore from rock increases exponentially as ore grade decreases
Ore grades have been decreasing over the past 100 years
Ore grades are slipping down into exponentially high-extraction cost territory
Dropping Money from Helicopters: Economist John Cochrane on Inflation
Summary
The Fiscal Theory of the Price Level states that government debt and the ability of the future government to pay it or pass it on are the determinants of inflation. This challenges the existing monetary theory which claims that inflation occurs when the monetary supply increases faster than the real value of goods and services.
This theory suggests that government liabilities will determine inflation in a fiat system. In a fiat system bonds and currency are stake in the government. Both are interpreted as debt of the government. The confidence of debt-holders in the government's willingness/ability to pay these debts will determine the price level. In low confidence environments, holding the debt is less fruitful than exchanging it for goods and services. In high confidence, holding the debt is worth the wait.
If true, inflation in the United States reflects a deterioration in the confidence of its economy and future. The solution to US inflation will come from fiscal policy, not monetary policy.
Notes
The first chapters are on Google Books. Very helpful for understanding the relationships and logic.
Monetary Theory of Inflation
Summary: Inflation created when monetary supply increases faster than the real value of goods/services
The government repurchasing bonds increases money supply, therefore inflation ought to ensue
Fiscal Theory of Inflation
Government-centric definition
Treats the government as a unique agent in the economy
The government issues debt with which it can be paid or pay with
Money is short-term, non-interest paying government debt
Bonds are long-term, interest paying government debt
Public debt is stake in the federal government
Applicable to fiat currency systems
Government has liabilities: debt payments + spending
Tax revenue reduces money supply
If there is a surplus after liabilities, deflation
If there is a deficit after liabilities, inflation via
Print money
Issue bonds
If the market perceives government bonds as not payable or low paying
Bonds are sold off in favor of currency
Currency is invested privately or spent
The price level is informed by the expectation that debt will be repaid
If debt is expected to be repaid, good is X chunks of debt
If debt is not expected to be repaid, good is X+Y chunks of debt
Evidence
The Fed does not control money supply, it sets interest rate targets
Liquid assets have increased by magnitudes, yet inflation has not reflected this
Monetary theory predicts inflation as they can be used to spend
Fiscal theory interprets them as options that can be converted to pay the government
1980s inflation
Government enacted high real interest rates
Interest rates raise interest costs on the debt
Latin America
Inflation controls are ineffective as debt is regularly viewed as unpayable
WW1
Inflation was not solved by monetary tightening, but rather fiscal policies and guarantees
Reparations
Complications
Dependency on "expectations" is somewhat cyclical
The idea of expectations can be abused to fill in any gaps of the theory
Quotes
"Raising tax rates is like going up a sand dune. Every time you take a step the base shrinks and you come back a little bit."